No limit to state parties’ money laundering

J■ By Thomas D. Elias / Columnist ust in case anyone wonders what the real issue was in the very close race between Eric Bauman and Kimberly Ellis over who would become the next chairperson of the California Democratic Party, it was money. No, not salary or other personal emoluments, although Bauman – the party’s longtime Los Angeles County leader – has received his share of payments from ballot initiative campaigns. This was really about who would control the purse strings of the nation’s most successful state party and thus decide who gets its many millions of laundered dollars in each election cycle. It’s all because the year-2000 Proposition 34 made

This content is restricted to site members. If you are an existing user, please log in. New users may register below.

Existing Users Log In